I don't know if this is a calm before the storm kind of thing, but rest assured that if the 2016 election had gone another way, this story would be touted as a positive side effect of the nuclear deal. And the wisdom of Democratic foreign policy. But with a combative president currently in office who has been throwing tomatoes (and thankfully nothing else) at the ayatollahs, that argument can't be credibly made, so instead people largely ignore the story. There's a reason that this article appears in the Wall Street Journal and not the New York Times, Washington Post, or on any of the broadcast networks. Can't have positive stories like this out there, now can we? I've said it for years... what ISN'T reported is every bit as significant as what IS...
from Facebook http://ift.tt/2EaaSoT
via IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment